Denial code

OA 23

A prior payer already adjusted this, and that adjustment carries over.

Fix and resubmit OA

What OA 23 means

OA — Other adjustment — most often coordination of benefits.

So it belongs to neither side yet. Work the coordination of benefits before you treat any of it as lost money.

Is it worth appealing?

Fix and resubmit. This is a correction, not an appeal. Appealing burns the deadline.

Why it fires

In the order we see it.

  1. The primary payer's allowed amount and adjustments flowed through to the secondary payer.

  2. The primary EOB was not attached, so the secondary could not reconcile the balance.

What to do

Read the primary EOB first. This is usually the secondary correctly honouring the primary's allowed amount, not a denial.

What actually wins it

The documentation, not the argument.

The primary payer's EOB, attached to the secondary claim.

The common mistake. Do not appeal this as a denial. In most cases the secondary is behaving correctly and the balance is contractual or patient responsibility.

Where this comes from. This is our own reading of the code, not the payer's and not a copy of the standards text. We classify it from how these denials actually resolve. Where we are unsure, we say so rather than guessing.

Related codes

Free denial review

How much of this is sitting in your write-off pile?

Send your denial summary for the last ninety days. Four columns: payer, CARC code, count, billed amount. I will tell you which were winnable and what they were worth.

Send your denial summary No patient data. No BAA. No charge.