Denial code

CO 29

Filed after the payer deadline.

Usually lost CO

What CO 29 means

CO — Contractual obligation — the provider absorbs it and cannot bill the patient.

So the balance cannot move to the patient. Either the appeal recovers it or the practice absorbs it. That makes the appeal decision the whole decision on this line.

Is it worth appealing?

Usually lost. Recoverable only with unusual evidence. Triage by dollar value.

Why it fires

In the order we see it.

  1. The claim was filed after the payer's deadline.

  2. The primary paid late and the secondary clock ran out.

  3. The claim rejected at the clearinghouse and was never resubmitted.

What to do

Only recoverable with proof of timely submission: a clearinghouse acceptance report, or evidence the primary paid late.

What actually wins it

The documentation, not the argument.

A clearinghouse acceptance report carrying the original submission date.

The primary payer's EOB date, where the delay was theirs.

The common mistake. Do not appeal without a timestamp. Without proof of timely submission there is nothing to argue, and the appeal is wasted effort.

Where this comes from. This is our own reading of the code, not the payer's and not a copy of the standards text. We classify it from how these denials actually resolve. Where we are unsure, we say so rather than guessing.

Free denial review

How much of this is sitting in your write-off pile?

Send your denial summary for the last ninety days. Four columns: payer, CARC code, count, billed amount. I will tell you which were winnable and what they were worth.

Send your denial summary No patient data. No BAA. No charge.